On the Path to Modernization: Adaptive Software in Education Technologies


Education technology is a brilliant innovation in the modern educational life.  The EdTech enables students to learn the same topic in the same way at the same speed. Having been impressed by the benefits of technology in the education, B.F. Skinner, a Harvard psychologist, invented new teaching machines to enable learners to tackle questions at their own pace. Despite the overwhelming significance of the gadgets, the enthusiasm dropped upon the imitation gizmos in the market. Moreover, the conservatism of teachers and their unions has prompted a repeated hype and flop cycles of the edtech. Besides, the brain-stretching potential of edtech has significantly contributed to an unsteady utilization of gizmos in the educational life.

Successful learning must integrate edtech at the service of learning and not otherwise. Currently, Skinner’s heirs are persuading the skeptics to soften their stands. Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, are supporting the schools around the world to embrace new software to personalize learning. The stakeholders have implemented proper measures to control learners from learning unnecessary internet’s content. The edtech boosters are coded to resist the temptation of reviving harmful ideas on how children are learning. In other words, it is deemed significant particularly for the millions of children stuck in dismal classes.

Modernization in education system

The traditional schooling system emerged in Prussia. However, various alternative approaches to upgrading the conventional model have flopped. The conventional norm for the majority of the world’s schoolchildren are classrooms, standardized curriculum, and fixed timetables. Unfortunately, this model is not benefiting many pupils efficiently. For instance, only small portion of students in developing countries in acquiring the basic concept of maths, reading, and science. Nevertheless, only a few students from rich countries can meet their proficiency on the primary subjects.

Handled poorly in the administration of education, computers have potential to distract. Schools with slow broadband and a ban on sites like YouTube exceptionally excel than high-tech schools. Administration of edtech is vital in schools rather than equipping the schools with high-end technologies. Australia, for instance, had more computers than pupils. According to reformers, edtech can put individual attention within reach of all pupils. American schools are embracing personalized, digital learning. Hundreds of schools are copying methods of groups like Summit Public Schools. The software was written for nothing by Facebook engineers.

The invention of adaptive software like Mindspark is efficient in improving learning among primary school. The software can work out what a child knows and pose relevant questions accordingly. The majority of the children in India leave primary school unable to read a simple text. However, the use of Mindspark software after school prompts huge gains in math and reading among the pupils in primary schools. Edtech can aid learning in by making the schools more productive. In California, schools are more productive through effective utilization of software to overhaul the traditional model. Rather than using textbooks, pupils have embraced the use of playlists software to access online lessons and submit assignments. The use of software help to assesses children’s progress and lightening an exclusive workload for teachers. The software is also programmed to provide insight on the performance of students. Indeed, the modernization of education through technology is crucial in saving the teachers’ time which could be used to undertake other duties like fostering pupils’ social skills and one-on-one tuition. Children introduced to modern education system perform extremely better than their peers in conventional models.

Proper implementation of education technology

Modernization of educational system is welcome. However, efficient utilization of edtech means doing several things right. The procedures to implement personalized learning are sensitive for learners to follow by themselves. Noncompliance with the procedures should not form an excuse of reviving pseudoscientific ideas. Such inconsistency often leads to educational kinesiology. The other flimsy consequential falsehood about technology claims that learners do not need to learn facts from teachers but use Google. However, it is conventionally clear that learning relied on the craft of the teacher.

Lastly, edtech should help to eliminate discrimination in the educational system. In some cases, it promotes inequalities in the education system. The charter-school groups teaching poor pupils should embrace edtech. In the recent past, the modernization of learning has widely been embraced by private schools in Silicon Valley thus widening inequalities in education. For decades, the greatest beneficiaries of edtech are children using software to receive remedial classes.



Enormous potential for education technology will fully be realized when teachers and stakeholders embrace it in schools. They have moral and professional authority to questions how effectively can products work to improve students’ performance. However, such skepticism should not be misunderstood as a hindrance to technology. Though the technology had been perceived as a waste of time and resources, its promises today has convinced the majority about the need for education technology to have better results. Nevertheless, it can make students study more efficient so not to look for someone with a question like “Can you write my essay?’’ when they have a number of academic assignments. The collective approach should be undertaken to embrace this modernization and phase out the conventional model in education.